Trump Trade Policy A Failure - House Committee Meets Today

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- April 22, 2026 -- U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is testifying today before the House Ways and Means Committee on the Administration’s trade policy. The data shows it has been a costly mistake that has failed by even its own metrics of increasing manufacturing jobs and reducing the U.S. trade deficit.

Businesses in states represented by House Ways and Means Members paid $190 billion in extra tariffs between March 2025 and February 2026, including at least $113 billion in illegal IEEPA tariffs.

We Pay the Tariffs, a coalition of over 1,100 small businesses nationwide, is releasing this data as Ambassador Greer testifies before Congress and is calling on him to stop adding new tariffs while manufacturing jobs fall to decade-plus lows. In testimony before the committee today Ambassador Greer said that Administration trade policies are “bearing fruit for American workers.”

But says  Dan Anthony, Executive Director of We Pay the Tariffs, “Any objective look at the data shows administration trade policies have resulted in the lose-lose scenario of higher costs and fewer manufacturing jobs.”

One Year of Tariffs: Businesses and Workers are Paying a Steep Price

The $190 billion in extra tariffs paid by companies in states represented by Ways and Means Members from March 2025 to February 2026 included an estimated:

$113 billion in now-illegal IEEPA tariffs
$30 billion in Section 232 tariffs related to steel and aluminum
$25 billion in Section 232 tariffs related to autos and parts
$21 billion in Section 301 tariffs related to China
$1.4 billion in other Section 232 tariffs

The figures include $2.4 billion in extra tariffs paid by companies in Chairman Jason Smith’s home state of Missouri and $2.9 billion in extra tariffs paid by companies in Ranking Member Richard Neal’s home state of Massachusetts.

States where imports faced the highest average tariff increase included Oklahoma (+27.1%), Missouri (+26.1%), Nevada (+25.7%), Iowa (+25.3%), and Texas (+24.2%).

Despite these high costs, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ State and Area Employment, Hours, and Earnings database shows they have not produced a manufacturing revival.