Deep Listening & Presence:
They would practice truly listening to constituents, colleagues, and even opponents, seeking to understand perspectives without immediately formulating rebuttals or judgments. They'd be more present in discussions and debates.
Non-Attachment to Ego & Power:
Success wouldn't be solely defined by winning elections or accumulating power. There would be less attachment to personal ambition or legacy, and more focus on serving the common good. They might be more willing to admit mistakes or change course.
Reduced Attachment to Ideology:
While holding values, they wouldn't be rigidly bound by ideology. They could assess situations more objectively and be open to pragmatic solutions, even if they cross party lines.
Compassion in Policy:
Decisions would be informed by a deeper understanding of the suffering and needs of all involved, aiming for policies that reduce harm and promote well-being, rather than just benefiting a select group or winning political points.
Awareness of Interconnectedness:
They would recognize that issues are complex and interrelated, considering the long-term consequences of actions on the whole system (society, environment) rather than focusing on short-term gains or isolated problems.
Mindful Communication (Right Speech):
They would strive for communication that is truthful, constructive, and less driven by anger, fear, or the desire to manipulate. Less divisive rhetoric, more dialogue.
Focus on Process, Not Just Outcome:
While working towards goals, there would be an appreciation for the process itself – negotiation, collaboration, deliberation – seeing it as valuable, not just a means to an end.
Essentially, a "perfect" President and politician would operate with less ego, less attachment to fixed positions, more awareness of the present moment and interconnected reality, and a greater sense of compassion.
Essentially, a "perfect" President and politician would operate with less ego, less attachment to fixed positions, more awareness of the present moment and interconnected reality, and a greater sense of compassion.
It would be a radical departure from politics driven primarily by conflict, ambition, and rigid ideology.
I would love to have people like this in government. At at local level, I have seen this. On larger scales, where campaigns are expensive, candidates tend to compromise their true values in order to raise money. And since the "Citizens United" verdict, the competition for votes has slanted towards serious 'bending of the knee' to big money.
ReplyDelete